Competent Person
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Student
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 3:41 pm
- 7
Competent Person
Hi All,
Just a quick question.
What qualification do you require to be a 'Competent Person'?
I have NEBOSH and currently undertaking an online NVQ. Do I need to wait until I've completed the course and become a GradIOSH member?
Appreciate any help you can give.
Just a quick question.
What qualification do you require to be a 'Competent Person'?
I have NEBOSH and currently undertaking an online NVQ. Do I need to wait until I've completed the course and become a GradIOSH member?
Appreciate any help you can give.
- fs1982
- Snr Member
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:03 pm
- 9
- Industry Sector: Engineering - Welding/Fabrication
- Occupation: Compliance Officer
- Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Competent Person
A qualification on its own does not make you a competent person - the qualification on its own MAY give you some of the base line knowledge to be competent but it also requires a mix of experience and other skills.
The level of knowledge, skills and experience required to be a competent person really depends on the type of work place you are going to be the competent person for - the skills set for a competent person in a low-risk purely administrative office will be very different to the skills set required for the competent person in an high-risk oil refinery. Your NGC might be ok for the prior but definitely not for the latter.
The level of knowledge, skills and experience required to be a competent person really depends on the type of work place you are going to be the competent person for - the skills set for a competent person in a low-risk purely administrative office will be very different to the skills set required for the competent person in an high-risk oil refinery. Your NGC might be ok for the prior but definitely not for the latter.
- Elf&Safety
- Jnr Member
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:11 pm
- 9
- Industry Sector: Micro-Electronics Manufacture
- Occupation: Health, Safety and Environmental Officer
- Location: England
Re: Competent Person
Your question simply can't be answered... what level of compentence are you trying to show? Manager? Officer? Explosive atmosphere specialist?? Competence depends on vairous factors, training, experience etc...
- Alexis
- Official HSfB Legend
- Posts: 48845
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:52 am
- 20
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/AlexisHSfB
- Location: West Lothian
- Has thanked: 2821 times
- Been thanked: 340 times
- Contact:
Re: Competent Person
Agree ohreally.
"A candle loses none of its light by lighting another candle."
Hundreds of FREE Health & Safety Downloads Here
Hundreds of FREE Health & Safety Downloads Here
- bernicarey
- Anorak Extraordinaire
- Posts: 8973
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:50 am
- 15
- Twitter: @bernicarey
- Industry Sector: Consultancy/Training
- Occupation: Safety, Health, Environment and Fire Consultant.
- Location: The heart of the East Midlands...
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 300 times
- Contact:
Re: Competent Person
Hello Jules
A 'Competent Person' is defined in the Management Regs s7(5) as
Unfortunately, far too many people are out there practising as H&S or Fire Safety Advisors at a level beyond their 'training and experience'. What is really worrying is that while there are undoubtedly some 'cowboys' out there, in the majority of cases these people are simply ignorant of their own lack of knowledge and think they are doing a good job.
By way of illustration, I once encountered a problem with a 2 story Church Hall complex, a Grade II Listed building, which I just happened to visit because my Charity client rented some rooms there.
I was not happy to see that the fire escape from upstairs, where they held their Sunday School with children as young as 2 or 3, was via a wooden sash window (which of course sticks) and down a metal hooped ladder about 7ft, before going across a flat roof and down some steps.
I voiced my grave concerns to the 'Minister' in charge and was aggressively rebutted with 'We have a fireman in our congregation who says this is fine; the children love having a fire practice out of the window.'
When I reported them to the local FRS, they were given severe restrictions on the way they used the building until they sorted out the means of escape. So much for their in-house fireman advice.
A 'Competent Person' is defined in the Management Regs s7(5) as
or in the RRFSO s18(5) asA person shall be regarded as competent ...... where he has sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities to enable him properly to assist in undertaking the measures referred to .....
So you don't need any formal qualifications, you just need to know the subject matter to an appropriate degree.A person is to be regarded as competent for the purposes of this article where he has sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities to enable him properly to assist in undertaking the preventive and protective measures.
Unfortunately, far too many people are out there practising as H&S or Fire Safety Advisors at a level beyond their 'training and experience'. What is really worrying is that while there are undoubtedly some 'cowboys' out there, in the majority of cases these people are simply ignorant of their own lack of knowledge and think they are doing a good job.
By way of illustration, I once encountered a problem with a 2 story Church Hall complex, a Grade II Listed building, which I just happened to visit because my Charity client rented some rooms there.
I was not happy to see that the fire escape from upstairs, where they held their Sunday School with children as young as 2 or 3, was via a wooden sash window (which of course sticks) and down a metal hooped ladder about 7ft, before going across a flat roof and down some steps.
I voiced my grave concerns to the 'Minister' in charge and was aggressively rebutted with 'We have a fireman in our congregation who says this is fine; the children love having a fire practice out of the window.'
When I reported them to the local FRS, they were given severe restrictions on the way they used the building until they sorted out the means of escape. So much for their in-house fireman advice.
- Messy
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 3588
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:59 am
- 17
- Occupation: 46 years experience with a metropolitan Fire Brigade and then Fire Safety Manager for a global brand.
Now sort of retired from the fire safety game, but doing the odd job here and there to keep my grey matter working and as I hate sudoku and havent got the back for an allotment - Location: Sunny London where the streets are paved with gold ;)
- Has thanked: 369 times
- Been thanked: 663 times
Re: Competent Person
The reality is you do not have to be 'competent ' to complete a fire risk assessment.
The FRA has to be suitable and sufficient and anyone such as a fire alarm contractor, electrician or trainer who is assisting in undertaking the preventative and protective measures (as determined by the FRA) must be competent.
Post Grenfell this is bound to change
The FRA has to be suitable and sufficient and anyone such as a fire alarm contractor, electrician or trainer who is assisting in undertaking the preventative and protective measures (as determined by the FRA) must be competent.
Post Grenfell this is bound to change
- AdamJ
- Snr Member
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:51 pm
- 17
- Twitter: @thenoisechap
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Competent Person
Jules, you have nailed one of the great woolly areas in H&S, 'competent' is used everywhere, but then more often than not when associated HSE guidance is issued to clarify it the HSE Gods just, rather uselessly, use more words to say exactly the same thing. "A person shall be regarded as competent where he has sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities to enable him properly to assist in undertaking the measures referred to" is basically just another definition of competent, is the HSE using more words to say the same thing and doesn't help at all.
It's been a long-standing bug-bear of mine in H&S for decades now - if the Gods that rule us all want to define who should do a job, then go the whole hog and define it properly so there is a clear answer to the question, and if necessary introduce both academic and practical skills examinations to certify it properly. Until then, I would define 'competent' as "someone is perfectly competent to do a job and gets on with it to everyone's satisfaction until chance plays a part and something goes wrong at which point the fingers start pointing and their competence to do the job is now questioned".
It's been a long-standing bug-bear of mine in H&S for decades now - if the Gods that rule us all want to define who should do a job, then go the whole hog and define it properly so there is a clear answer to the question, and if necessary introduce both academic and practical skills examinations to certify it properly. Until then, I would define 'competent' as "someone is perfectly competent to do a job and gets on with it to everyone's satisfaction until chance plays a part and something goes wrong at which point the fingers start pointing and their competence to do the job is now questioned".
-
- Anorak Extraordinaire
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:55 pm
- 10
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
Re: Competent Person
It certainly is a tough one isn't it. At what point does experience become competence?
I once worked for a company where the H&S consultant had put in place abysmal training documentation for a piece of machinary and there was an accident. The Local Authority slapped a prohbition notice on the equipment for every but myself whilst new training material was produced and training conducted for staff. The only reason I was allowed to use it was 8 years experience. Would 5 years have made me competent? 2 years? 1 year?
Currently the company I am with would like to use me in a roll offering inspection services to other companies. On this issue, I am NOT a competent person as its a new area for me, but they seem to think a few months and thats all I need. Nope. Not going to happen.
FRA's are something I have done before, and just went through a decent qualification as well, but I would only be happy doing buildings I understand. Leisure facilities, no problem, a block of flats, no thanks.
I once worked for a company where the H&S consultant had put in place abysmal training documentation for a piece of machinary and there was an accident. The Local Authority slapped a prohbition notice on the equipment for every but myself whilst new training material was produced and training conducted for staff. The only reason I was allowed to use it was 8 years experience. Would 5 years have made me competent? 2 years? 1 year?
Currently the company I am with would like to use me in a roll offering inspection services to other companies. On this issue, I am NOT a competent person as its a new area for me, but they seem to think a few months and thats all I need. Nope. Not going to happen.
FRA's are something I have done before, and just went through a decent qualification as well, but I would only be happy doing buildings I understand. Leisure facilities, no problem, a block of flats, no thanks.
- Elf&Safety
- Jnr Member
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:11 pm
- 9
- Industry Sector: Micro-Electronics Manufacture
- Occupation: Health, Safety and Environmental Officer
- Location: England
Re: Competent Person
Does even training show competence? Did the training have a test at the end to assess what has been learnt and understood? Did the person listen? Did they use their training once complete?
I held a risk assessment training course, virtually everyone on the course said it was rubbish; which i agreed with. But they had technically been trained in risk assessment so were they now competent?
But if after years of doing a job, you didn't know how to do it properly i would be worried. However; maybe they were never shown the right way to do the job all those years ago!! Now i've written that... i just thought but what about all the drivers on the road who have been driving 30 years but are absolutely awful drivers and certainly not competant!!
I held a risk assessment training course, virtually everyone on the course said it was rubbish; which i agreed with. But they had technically been trained in risk assessment so were they now competent?
But if after years of doing a job, you didn't know how to do it properly i would be worried. However; maybe they were never shown the right way to do the job all those years ago!! Now i've written that... i just thought but what about all the drivers on the road who have been driving 30 years but are absolutely awful drivers and certainly not competant!!
-
- Anorak Extraordinaire
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:55 pm
- 10
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
Re: Competent Person
No, training doesn't make someone competent because training can never cover every eventuallity. In the example I mentioned above, the LA insisted I create the new training from the manufacturers operating manual, which is the correct way to do things. However, the situation that lead to all this wasn't covered by the operators manual, which the LA found interesting. My experience of the equipment however allowed me to put in place additional training to cover and number of scenarios the manual simply didnt contain.
In regards to risk assessing. Knowing how to risk assess doesnt make you a competent person to risk assess anything and everything because training only tells you HOW to risk asssess, not WHAT to risk assess.
I've written hundreds of risk assessments, but if someone said risk assess the removal of a car engine, I wouldnt have a clue. I could work with someone who knows how to do it and write and assessment that way though.
What you tend to get, especially in big companies, is generic 'coverall' risk assessments which only cover easily identifiable hazards (Slips trips, falls from height, manual handling etc) but never identifies unusual and unique risks.
Competency is a combination of factors, training, understanding, experience.
In regards to risk assessing. Knowing how to risk assess doesnt make you a competent person to risk assess anything and everything because training only tells you HOW to risk asssess, not WHAT to risk assess.
I've written hundreds of risk assessments, but if someone said risk assess the removal of a car engine, I wouldnt have a clue. I could work with someone who knows how to do it and write and assessment that way though.
What you tend to get, especially in big companies, is generic 'coverall' risk assessments which only cover easily identifiable hazards (Slips trips, falls from height, manual handling etc) but never identifies unusual and unique risks.
Competency is a combination of factors, training, understanding, experience.