Davie v New Merton Board Mills
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Student
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:40 am
- 16
- Occupation: Technical Advisor
- Location: West Midlands
Davie v New Merton Board Mills
Does anyone have any information on this specific case Thanks
Turn that frown upside down
- otto
- Grumpy Old Git
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:42 pm
- 20
- Industry Sector: Construction
- Occupation: Health and Safety
- Location: Swindon
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Contact:
Davie was injured when a defective chisel shattered, but his claim failed when the employer showed that the quipment had been bought from a reputable supplier and that the injury was caused by a hidden defect over which they had no reasonable control. This was sufficient to discharge their duty.
The decision has since been overhauled by statute law - in the form of The Employers' Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1968 which allows an injured employee to claim from the employer in the first instance because of some defect in the materials, equipment or plant.
Hope this helps
Otto
The decision has since been overhauled by statute law - in the form of The Employers' Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1968 which allows an injured employee to claim from the employer in the first instance because of some defect in the materials, equipment or plant.
Hope this helps
Otto
Purge the unsafe !!!
Lord of the garden shed and master of the gravelly patch....
Lord of the garden shed and master of the gravelly patch....