Image

Davie v New Merton Board Mills

Post all your health and safety law questions in here, whether it's case law, general law, individual Acts or Regulations you are challenged with, we are all here to help.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Bob Lewis
Student
Student
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:40 am
16
Occupation: Technical Advisor
Location: West Midlands

Davie v New Merton Board Mills

Post by Bob Lewis »

Does anyone have any information on this specific case :?: Thanks
Turn that frown upside down
User avatar
otto
Grumpy Old Git
Grumpy Old Git
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:42 pm
20
Industry Sector: Construction
Occupation: Health and Safety
Location: Swindon
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Post by otto »

Davie was injured when a defective chisel shattered, but his claim failed when the employer showed that the quipment had been bought from a reputable supplier and that the injury was caused by a hidden defect over which they had no reasonable control. This was sufficient to discharge their duty.

The decision has since been overhauled by statute law - in the form of The Employers' Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1968 which allows an injured employee to claim from the employer in the first instance because of some defect in the materials, equipment or plant.

Hope this helps
Otto 8)
Purge the unsafe !!!

Image

Lord of the garden shed and master of the gravelly patch....
Bob Lewis
Student
Student
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:40 am
16
Occupation: Technical Advisor
Location: West Midlands

Post by Bob Lewis »

Thanks for the information, really appreciated
Turn that frown upside down
Post Reply

 

Access Croner-i Navigate Safety-Lite here for free

HSfB Facebook Group Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook Find us on on LinkedIn

Terms of Use Privacy Policy