Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
Moderator: Moderators
- clio222
- Student
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:24 pm
- 14
- Occupation: Airport Firefighter
- Location: Fife
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
Hi all, question around Refuge Points / Temporary Waiting Spaces.
Firstly are these the same ?.
I have always used the term "Refuge Points" however on looking for the specification of these (Building Standards Technical Handbook 2023) it makes reference to Temporary Waiting Spaces, just wondering if this is the correct terminology that I should be using ?.
Thanks in advance
Firstly are these the same ?.
I have always used the term "Refuge Points" however on looking for the specification of these (Building Standards Technical Handbook 2023) it makes reference to Temporary Waiting Spaces, just wondering if this is the correct terminology that I should be using ?.
Thanks in advance
- Messy
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 3592
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:59 am
- 17
- Occupation: 46 years experience with a metropolitan Fire Brigade and then Fire Safety Manager for a global brand.
Now sort of retired from the fire safety game, but doing the odd job here and there to keep my grey matter working and as I hate sudoku and havent got the back for an allotment - Location: Sunny London where the streets are paved with gold ;)
- Has thanked: 373 times
- Been thanked: 669 times
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
It seems to be the same, but a Scottish v the rest of us thing (like battered Mars bars)
'Refuge' south of the border
Temporary Waiting Spaces' north of the border
Frankly neither explain their use in terms of they are designed for emergencies
'Refuge' south of the border
Temporary Waiting Spaces' north of the border
Frankly neither explain their use in terms of they are designed for emergencies
- witsd
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:37 pm
- 9
- Occupation: Fire safety officer
- Location: Glasgow
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
Speaking as someone who moved from London to Glasgow, who gives a flying hoot what you call anything, so long as it does the job?
We often think that when we have completed our study of one we know all about two, because 'two' is 'one and one.' We forget that we still have to make a study of 'and.'
- WillPool
- HSfB Moderator
- Posts: 10817
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:45 pm
- 18
- Industry Sector: Construction/Civils/Telecomms
- Occupation: Regional Safety Director
- Location: Tabuk - Saudi Arabia
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 331 times
- Contact:
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
whilst I get the gist of what you mean, I would expect a judge to 'give a flying hoot' to what you call something, if anything ever ended up in court
Will
It is better to be careful 100 times than to get killed once.
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
- witsd
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:37 pm
- 9
- Occupation: Fire safety officer
- Location: Glasgow
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
Really though? So long as what you were doing was logical and you were able to justify your decisions, I really, really doubt any rational judge is going to throw the book at you for using the wrong term unless there's evidence that you were doing so for some nefarious purpose.
Is there any suggestion that this has happened previously?
We often think that when we have completed our study of one we know all about two, because 'two' is 'one and one.' We forget that we still have to make a study of 'and.'
- hammer1
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 2617
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:59 pm
- 17
- Industry Sector: Commercial, residential, construction
- Occupation: Health, Safety and Fire consultant
- Location: Sunny South London
- Been thanked: 46 times
- Contact:
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
Hi all
Been a while
Interesting topic as this is a massive issue we face currently with residential developments.
We await final BS documents like BS9991 and evacuation lift BS EN to be published, however we have the London Plan which say one thing and Approved Document B Volume 1 say something totally different.
Refuge areas and EVC systems installed when the building is unmanaged, the not knowing the difference between rescue and evacuation (rescue falls under FRS responsibility , when does an evacuation turn into a rescue?) all become a headache for RP
Some may say for 'stay put' developments, the evacuation element stops when the resident has left and closed FED to their flat, this then turns into a rescue situation as something serious has gone wrong if the flat cannot contain fire/smoke or other residents require to leave building.
If the building acts how it should in a fire, why not use a lift ? especially a FF lift (not been interfaced with detection system)? Until smoke ingress into lift shaft what is the likelihood of fire in flat and lift area at same time? Would the resident be on ground floor way before the FRS turn up?
Developers just install refuge areas with no consideration how it will be managed, then they say FF lifts can be used but are not configured for evacuation and a 2 way comms with no one at the other end (think how long before FRS arrive/set up and complete dynamic RA, poor resident will be waiting for ages before they are reassured).
There a reason why it is not in current ADB for residential.
Interesting times indeed folks
Been a while
Interesting topic as this is a massive issue we face currently with residential developments.
We await final BS documents like BS9991 and evacuation lift BS EN to be published, however we have the London Plan which say one thing and Approved Document B Volume 1 say something totally different.
Refuge areas and EVC systems installed when the building is unmanaged, the not knowing the difference between rescue and evacuation (rescue falls under FRS responsibility , when does an evacuation turn into a rescue?) all become a headache for RP
Some may say for 'stay put' developments, the evacuation element stops when the resident has left and closed FED to their flat, this then turns into a rescue situation as something serious has gone wrong if the flat cannot contain fire/smoke or other residents require to leave building.
If the building acts how it should in a fire, why not use a lift ? especially a FF lift (not been interfaced with detection system)? Until smoke ingress into lift shaft what is the likelihood of fire in flat and lift area at same time? Would the resident be on ground floor way before the FRS turn up?
Developers just install refuge areas with no consideration how it will be managed, then they say FF lifts can be used but are not configured for evacuation and a 2 way comms with no one at the other end (think how long before FRS arrive/set up and complete dynamic RA, poor resident will be waiting for ages before they are reassured).
There a reason why it is not in current ADB for residential.
Interesting times indeed folks
The song goes...{I'm gonna walk down to electric avenue and I'm gonna say ' have you got PAT testing records for all that mate'}
- Alexis
- Official HSfB Legend
- Posts: 48868
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:52 am
- 20
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/AlexisHSfB
- Location: West Lothian
- Has thanked: 2867 times
- Been thanked: 341 times
- Contact:
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
Great to see you again Hammer. A while or not, you are always welcome. Many thanks for your input on this one.hammer1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 5:00 pm Hi all
Been a while
Interesting topic as this is a massive issue we face currently with residential developments.
We await final BS documents like BS9991 and evacuation lift BS EN to be published, however we have the London Plan which say one thing and Approved Document B Volume 1 say something totally different.
Refuge areas and EVC systems installed when the building is unmanaged, the not knowing the difference between rescue and evacuation (rescue falls under FRS responsibility , when does an evacuation turn into a rescue?) all become a headache for RP
Some may say for 'stay put' developments, the evacuation element stops when the resident has left and closed FED to their flat, this then turns into a rescue situation as something serious has gone wrong if the flat cannot contain fire/smoke or other residents require to leave building.
If the building acts how it should in a fire, why not use a lift ? especially a FF lift (not been interfaced with detection system)? Until smoke ingress into lift shaft what is the likelihood of fire in flat and lift area at same time? Would the resident be on ground floor way before the FRS turn up?
Developers just install refuge areas with no consideration how it will be managed, then they say FF lifts can be used but are not configured for evacuation and a 2 way comms with no one at the other end (think how long before FRS arrive/set up and complete dynamic RA, poor resident will be waiting for ages before they are reassured).
There a reason why it is not in current ADB for residential.
Interesting times indeed folks
"A candle loses none of its light by lighting another candle."
Hundreds of FREE Health & Safety Downloads Here
Hundreds of FREE Health & Safety Downloads Here
- Messy
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 3592
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:59 am
- 17
- Occupation: 46 years experience with a metropolitan Fire Brigade and then Fire Safety Manager for a global brand.
Now sort of retired from the fire safety game, but doing the odd job here and there to keep my grey matter working and as I hate sudoku and havent got the back for an allotment - Location: Sunny London where the streets are paved with gold ;)
- Has thanked: 373 times
- Been thanked: 669 times
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
hammer1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 5:00 pm Hi all
Been a while
Interesting topic as this is a massive issue we face currently with residential developments.
We await final BS documents like BS9991 and evacuation lift BS EN to be published, however we have the London Plan which say one thing and Approved Document B Volume 1 say something totally different.
Refuge areas and EVC systems installed when the building is unmanaged, the not knowing the difference between rescue and evacuation (rescue falls under FRS responsibility , when does an evacuation turn into a rescue?) all become a headache for RP
Some may say for 'stay put' developments, the evacuation element stops when the resident has left and closed FED to their flat, this then turns into a rescue situation as something serious has gone wrong if the flat cannot contain fire/smoke or other residents require to leave building.
If the building acts how it should in a fire, why not use a lift ? especially a FF lift (not been interfaced with detection system)? Until smoke ingress into lift shaft what is the likelihood of fire in flat and lift area at same time? Would the resident be on ground floor way before the FRS turn up?
Developers just install refuge areas with no consideration how it will be managed, then they say FF lifts can be used but are not configured for evacuation and a 2 way comms with no one at the other end (think how long before FRS arrive/set up and complete dynamic RA, poor resident will be waiting for ages before they are reassured).
There a reason why it is not in current ADB for residential.
Interesting times indeed folks
I rarely agree with Colin Todd, but his submission to the Hacket (or Moore-Bick) Inquiry basically said PEEPS and associated processes will not work in general residential blocks
Of course this didn't go down well with the more sensitive types, but he has a point. If the landlord hasn't got anyone on site, managing a 'disabled' evacuation is not viable
Meanwhile the fire safety industry has been left with a raft of advice and standards- much of it overlapping and contrary.
I am not aware of the London Plan. If it provides different standards for the capital, we will end up back in the pre RRO days of local byelaws and confused businesses who have estate across the UK
Sorry to get political but Theresa May stood outside the charred ruins of Grenfell in 2017 and promised change. Its 2024 and people still live in flats clad in unsuitable material, and the confusion in standards that was partly responsible for the fire have been added to by even more confusing legislation, guidance and standards.
The Tories have let the UK down here as they seem distracted by helping the house building and construction material Tory donors than they do helping those at risk
I am so pleased I am not working in residential blocks now and am happy to leave it in the hands of a very small group of capable experts like Hammer
- witsd
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:37 pm
- 9
- Occupation: Fire safety officer
- Location: Glasgow
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Refuge points / Temporary waiting spaces
I am very pleased to be working for a housing association that has dealt with anything close to being combustible cladding. Also being north of the border helps too.
It remains the case that thinking about low-rise amenity blocks takes up a lot more of my thinking time than any of our high-rises.
It remains the case that thinking about low-rise amenity blocks takes up a lot more of my thinking time than any of our high-rises.
We often think that when we have completed our study of one we know all about two, because 'two' is 'one and one.' We forget that we still have to make a study of 'and.'