Hi All,
Looking for a steer for management in a purpose built hospice. We are acting as property managers and a query has been raised by the management team regarding the FRA and adequacy of fire safety training.
Firstly, is it correct to use Health Technical Memorandums as guidance for this type of premises? We've looked at HTM05-02 Appendix H and see that this does cover Hospices so I am hoping we are starting at the correct point? Obviously FSO2005 has ultimate jurisdiction so looking at HTM's as guidance.
The FRA has said that the staff training can consist purely of an online fire safety training for all staff is adequate.
But, when we refer to HTM05-01 (Section 11 - Training) sections 11.17 and 11.18 suggests that e-learning is not adequate alone?? So does this suggest generic fire safety e-learning is adequate as long as it is backed up with bespoke training from a competent person?
If anyone has experience in this specific field, we would be grateful for your thoughts! We wanted to get our facts right before we challenge the FRA (if we needed to).
Thanks as always for any thoughts / experiences / ideas on this query. Always really appreciated.
Staff training / Care Homes & Hospice
Moderator: Moderators
- Paul1979
- Member
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 4:19 pm
- 7
- Industry Sector: Property Management including H&S
- Occupation: Property Manager including reviewing of H&S assessments and implementing remedial actions...or trying to justify why they are over the top and an alternative solution can be found!!
- Location: London
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Staff training / Care Homes & Hospice
"If life were predictable it would cease to be life and be without flavor."
- Messy
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 3588
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:59 am
- 17
- Occupation: 46 years experience with a metropolitan Fire Brigade and then Fire Safety Manager for a global brand.
Now sort of retired from the fire safety game, but doing the odd job here and there to keep my grey matter working and as I hate sudoku and havent got the back for an allotment - Location: Sunny London where the streets are paved with gold ;)
- Has thanked: 369 times
- Been thanked: 663 times
Re: Staff training / Care Homes & Hospice
HTMs are aimed at NHS Healthcare establishments and not 'mandatory' in private settings. However, why reinvent the wheel?
I was a Hospital FS Advisor for 3 Mental Health Trusts and we had a constant battle with the bean-counters to reduce fire awareness to the absolute bone to save cash. One Trust's management were very actively against 'live' training. It all got a little bitter when I refused to author a change in FS training policy. I quoted Article 5(3) which says I have responsibilities for what I write/advise, and Article 21(2)(d) which States that training "be provided in a manner appropriate to the risk identified by the risk assessment'.
Note: Be careful here as that does not tie you down to the FRA assessors advice. It says be provided in a manner appropriate to the risk identified by the risk assessment. You should be able to put a business case together stating the risks are far higher than most workplaces and specialist evacuation procedures are part of the training as well as the prevention stuff that could well be done by elearning.
In the troubled MH Trust we eventually agreed on a compromise in that:
*Defining the term 'ward staff' was very contentious and a battle ensued over ward based admin staff (which I won) and cleaners (that I lost).
In my professional opinion, it is necessary to look at the risk. The single biggest issue is where persons cannot self-evacuate, or where relevant persons are so vulnerable that attempting self evacuation may harm or kill them, extra training must be provided. I cannot recall the HTM;s exact wording, but it went along similar lines.
In situations where staff have to assist persons from the building (or utilise progressive horizontal evacuation- - that is, the staff have to stay in the risk area longer than they otherwise would do if evacuating the premises, it is beyond belief that management feel that e-learning is enough.
From my limited knowledge of the amazing hospice sector, there will be O2 cylinders and other medical kit plugged into patients, there will be volunteers and there will be families visiting at all hours - who will NOT leave granny to burn to death and will complicate any evacuation.
If HTM guidance suits, pick n mix it to back up your business case. Where it doesn't, demonstrate the risk without guidance. Have you got fire drill reports? If so, can you use findings from a drill to demonstrate how critical training is?
In summary
Go with your guts - your professional guts, but assess the risks using your judgement and only using guidance where it suits
Avoid emotion, as a hospice (like a forensic mental health unit) is full of dreadful individual stories that should not influence you
Demonstrate the risks that may be (almost) unique to the hospice area (Families being onboard all day and volunteers being two)
Is there a licensing authority? Have a look or consult with them for advice - ignoring it if you disagree
Maybe split staff into groups that will only get e-learning and those who will get additional input. Package this as a compromise solution
Own your advice and get a written response if the client disagrees. Minute and record everything and let them know you are doing so
Good luck and prepare for a hard slog. I feel very strongly that our MOST vulnerable in society get the absolute best care. Cutting FS training does not provide that care to the client or protect the often very dedicated staff that might get into all sorts of bother trying to help
I was a Hospital FS Advisor for 3 Mental Health Trusts and we had a constant battle with the bean-counters to reduce fire awareness to the absolute bone to save cash. One Trust's management were very actively against 'live' training. It all got a little bitter when I refused to author a change in FS training policy. I quoted Article 5(3) which says I have responsibilities for what I write/advise, and Article 21(2)(d) which States that training "be provided in a manner appropriate to the risk identified by the risk assessment'.
Note: Be careful here as that does not tie you down to the FRA assessors advice. It says be provided in a manner appropriate to the risk identified by the risk assessment. You should be able to put a business case together stating the risks are far higher than most workplaces and specialist evacuation procedures are part of the training as well as the prevention stuff that could well be done by elearning.
In the troubled MH Trust we eventually agreed on a compromise in that:
*Defining the term 'ward staff' was very contentious and a battle ensued over ward based admin staff (which I won) and cleaners (that I lost).
In my professional opinion, it is necessary to look at the risk. The single biggest issue is where persons cannot self-evacuate, or where relevant persons are so vulnerable that attempting self evacuation may harm or kill them, extra training must be provided. I cannot recall the HTM;s exact wording, but it went along similar lines.
In situations where staff have to assist persons from the building (or utilise progressive horizontal evacuation- - that is, the staff have to stay in the risk area longer than they otherwise would do if evacuating the premises, it is beyond belief that management feel that e-learning is enough.
From my limited knowledge of the amazing hospice sector, there will be O2 cylinders and other medical kit plugged into patients, there will be volunteers and there will be families visiting at all hours - who will NOT leave granny to burn to death and will complicate any evacuation.
If HTM guidance suits, pick n mix it to back up your business case. Where it doesn't, demonstrate the risk without guidance. Have you got fire drill reports? If so, can you use findings from a drill to demonstrate how critical training is?
In summary
Go with your guts - your professional guts, but assess the risks using your judgement and only using guidance where it suits
Avoid emotion, as a hospice (like a forensic mental health unit) is full of dreadful individual stories that should not influence you
Demonstrate the risks that may be (almost) unique to the hospice area (Families being onboard all day and volunteers being two)
Is there a licensing authority? Have a look or consult with them for advice - ignoring it if you disagree
Maybe split staff into groups that will only get e-learning and those who will get additional input. Package this as a compromise solution
Own your advice and get a written response if the client disagrees. Minute and record everything and let them know you are doing so
Good luck and prepare for a hard slog. I feel very strongly that our MOST vulnerable in society get the absolute best care. Cutting FS training does not provide that care to the client or protect the often very dedicated staff that might get into all sorts of bother trying to help
- Paul1979
- Member
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 4:19 pm
- 7
- Industry Sector: Property Management including H&S
- Occupation: Property Manager including reviewing of H&S assessments and implementing remedial actions...or trying to justify why they are over the top and an alternative solution can be found!!
- Location: London
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Staff training / Care Homes & Hospice
Messy, thank you so much for such a comprehensive response - much appreciated.
"If life were predictable it would cease to be life and be without flavor."
-
- Anorak Extraordinaire
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:55 pm
- 10
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
Re: Staff training / Care Homes & Hospice
I've always assumed, as a bare minimum, that it was initial (and refresher) training combined with your fire drills. You can do your training online but it's your fire drill that will be the key element.