Interested in people's view on this:
Doctor writes a letter and states that due to unidentified allergies, the employee should wear a facemask but does not state which (particulate or vapour/gas), even though the diagnosis is for a skin condition that is not documented as being affected by any vapours or alike (with the exception of skin contact)!
The snag of course is that without further assistance from the Doctor I will need to decide which is better based on the limited information provided; made all the more difficult as they will only need to wear it when dealing with very low risk hazardous substances (which is infrequent to say the least), so comfort and style / size play a major part in this if we want to ensure the employee wears it when required!
Dr's, don't you just adore them!
RPE
Moderator: Moderators
- bernicarey
- Anorak Extraordinaire
- Posts: 8973
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:50 am
- 15
- Twitter: @bernicarey
- Industry Sector: Consultancy/Training
- Occupation: Safety, Health, Environment and Fire Consultant.
- Location: The heart of the East Midlands...
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 300 times
- Contact:
Re: RPE
Send a letter to the Doctor saying that unless he/she is more specific, you are unable to comply.
A 'face mask' will only cover the respiratory passages, i.e. mouth and nose, so if it is a skin condition, are they saying that the employee has to wear a full face mask/hood?
Even a full face mask will still leave scalp and neck exposed, so where is the allergic reaction taking place? Does the employee need other areas protecting too?
A 'face mask' will only cover the respiratory passages, i.e. mouth and nose, so if it is a skin condition, are they saying that the employee has to wear a full face mask/hood?
Even a full face mask will still leave scalp and neck exposed, so where is the allergic reaction taking place? Does the employee need other areas protecting too?
- Waterbaby
- HSfB Moderator
- Posts: 4714
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:53 am
- 12
- Industry Sector: Medical
- Location: Ireland
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 472 times
Re: RPE
So vague as to be utterly useless
Suggest this recommendation is reviewed by an Occupational Health Dr - https://www.som.org.uk/find-an-oh-professional
If letter is from a GP or Consultant Dermatologist - ask them to refer to your OH Doctor/ Dept (if you have one) for review.
Advise you may need to make additional arrangements (suitable and sufficient) to accommodate employee ( i.e. more to it for you to sort !!)
Patient's permission is required but not usually a problem
Please let us know how this one goes!
WB
#DrowningPrevention, #RespectTheWater
- kngc
- Member
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:29 pm
- 14
- Industry Sector: Health and Social Care
- Occupation: Health & Safety
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: RPE
Thx both, I am following this up with the employee first as I am now of the belief that it is they who have specified a mask! Letter is even more vague than I alluded to above!
Will let you know the upshot once I close this off
Thx
K
Will let you know the upshot once I close this off
Thx
K
Safety is no accident!