Hi,
I work for a large coporation in the motor industry.
I am finding it challenging to manage fire wardens effectively.
Is there an ideal ratio for this?
Does anyone utilise a live database for their management?
How do you ensure sufficient coverage throughout the entire day?
Thanks
Fire Warden Coverage
Moderator: Moderators
- WillPool
- HSfB Moderator
- Posts: 10865
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:45 pm
- 18
- Industry Sector: Construction/Civils/Telecomms
- Occupation: Regional Safety Director
- Location: Tabuk - Saudi Arabia
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
- Contact:
Re: Fire Warden Coverage
Hi Comatose, welcome to the forums
What I have done in companies before is work out what I need and then add 25% to ensure that there is coverage at all times including night shift, holidays etc.
A lot will be down to the size of the premises and available staff.
Sorry I don't have a plan or data base
Will
What I have done in companies before is work out what I need and then add 25% to ensure that there is coverage at all times including night shift, holidays etc.
A lot will be down to the size of the premises and available staff.
Sorry I don't have a plan or data base
Will
It is better to be careful 100 times than to get killed once.
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
-
- Anorak Extraordinaire
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:55 pm
- 10
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 209 times
Re: Fire Warden Coverage
I think there are some recommended ratios but not a legal requirement.
For Low, Medium and High Risk premises I seem to recall a ratio of 1 to 50, 20 and 15. However, I also recall other recomendations of doing it per floor, so if you have 50 over 2 floors, its 2 wardens not 1 in a low risk.
Then look at shift work. 2 shifts, double your wardens, 3 shifts, triple it - but obvious you have to have the minimum number on each shift.
Then you have to account for wardens not being on ite (holiday, sickness, meetings, training etc) - add 25% per shift.
Then you have to look at the layout of your building as see if the minimum number is adequate. Maybe you have a weird building shape or dangerous environments.Run drills to test this.
Sorry, i dont see to have my old paperwork that did a full preakdown of stuff.
For Low, Medium and High Risk premises I seem to recall a ratio of 1 to 50, 20 and 15. However, I also recall other recomendations of doing it per floor, so if you have 50 over 2 floors, its 2 wardens not 1 in a low risk.
Then look at shift work. 2 shifts, double your wardens, 3 shifts, triple it - but obvious you have to have the minimum number on each shift.
Then you have to account for wardens not being on ite (holiday, sickness, meetings, training etc) - add 25% per shift.
Then you have to look at the layout of your building as see if the minimum number is adequate. Maybe you have a weird building shape or dangerous environments.Run drills to test this.
Sorry, i dont see to have my old paperwork that did a full preakdown of stuff.
- Messy
- Grand Shidoshi
- Posts: 3597
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:59 am
- 17
- Occupation: 46 years experience with a metropolitan Fire Brigade and then Fire Safety Manager for a global brand.
Now sort of retired from the fire safety game, but doing the odd job here and there to keep my grey matter working and as I hate sudoku and havent got the back for an allotment - Location: Sunny London where the streets are paved with gold ;)
- Has thanked: 378 times
- Been thanked: 678 times
Re: Fire Warden Coverage
I cant say I have seen any advice and frankly it would be daft to try and quantify it as it really does depend on risk and what evacuation procedures are in place
A large concert venue with 10s of thousands of people that are unfamiliar with the building will need quite a few wardens at key points to show the way out
An office with 98% staff(2% visitors) who are familiar with the layout so need no guidance, but where wardens are used to sweep an area and ensure it is empty would perhaps need a lower ratio of wardens to evacuees
Then of course there's the resilience issue, made 100 x worse in recent years by working from home, so the amount of trained wardens you have is likely to be considerably more if your firm does lots of WTF
So its really down to you and a risk assessed judgement .... I am sorry this is a bit wooly and vague - but that is the joy of risk assessed based fire safety legislation compared with the old prescriptive nonsense, in that you can decide your own risk and control measures (within reason!!!)
A large concert venue with 10s of thousands of people that are unfamiliar with the building will need quite a few wardens at key points to show the way out
An office with 98% staff(2% visitors) who are familiar with the layout so need no guidance, but where wardens are used to sweep an area and ensure it is empty would perhaps need a lower ratio of wardens to evacuees
Then of course there's the resilience issue, made 100 x worse in recent years by working from home, so the amount of trained wardens you have is likely to be considerably more if your firm does lots of WTF
So its really down to you and a risk assessed judgement .... I am sorry this is a bit wooly and vague - but that is the joy of risk assessed based fire safety legislation compared with the old prescriptive nonsense, in that you can decide your own risk and control measures (within reason!!!)