|
31 May 2006 - Air Test Certificate Forgery
Leads to Prosecution
Navigation
An elite Health and Safety Executive (HSE) licensed asbestos
removal company, TW Insulation, based in Liverpool and their company Director,
Christopher Jarnell, were prosecuted by the HSE at Liverpool Magistrates Court,
on 29 May 2006, for procedural failings and fraud, following the discovery of an
asbestos air test certificate forgery.
TW Insulation admitted breaching the Health and Safety at Work
Act, by "failing to conduct its undertaking as asbestos removal
contracts in such a way as to ensure so far as was reasonably practicable that
persons not in its employment were not exposed to risk to their health by the
company's failure to prepare an adequate asbestos survey report".
Christopher Jarnell also admitted breaching the HSWA by not
taking "reasonable care for the health and safety of others who might be
affected by his act or omissions at work in that he promulgated a forged air
test certificate with the intention that people would rely on it."
The procedural failures and forgery took place five years ago,
when landlords of Graeme House, Liverpool, commissioned TW Insulation to carry
out the safe removal of asbestos on the lower floors of their premises, which
were undergoing renovation at the time. The upper floors remained
occupied whilst the work was carried out.
The asbestos removal was carried out by TW Insulation.
However, they failed to complete the process by calling in an asbestos survey
expert to check asbestos air particles, by completing an air test, in order that
the air test certificate could be issued for compliance of the Regulations.
Company Director, Christopher Jarnell, produced a forged air
test certificate, which suggested to the clients, that there were now no safety
risks and by the time the forgery was discovered, it was too late to know if
there had been airborne particles or not.
Commenting after the hearing, HSE Principal Inspector, Wayne
Crumpton said:
"People are entitled to expect that licensed asbestos removal
contractors should bring a great deal of expertise to the job.
"In this situation there was a significant failure to deal
with this matter to the required standards.
"When the work had been completed there should have been a
proper clearance procedure by a qualified person to check that all asbestos had
been removed and the building was safe. This procedure was not carried out."
TW Insulation was fined £15,000, plus £10,000 court costs,
whilst company Director Christopher Jarnell was ordered to pay a £3,000 fine
plus £2,000 costs.
Judge Richard Clancy told Mr. Jarnell his conduct was
"disgraceful" and that a hearing in a higher court would undoubtedly have
resulted in a prison sentence.
Information on asbestos can be accessed from the updated HSE
webpage by clicking the following:
Asbestos health and safety in the workplace
Further information on the History of Asbestos, an Article by
John Johnston AIIRSM, HSfB Owner, can also be accessed from our own HSfB
Website, by clicking the following:
History of Asbestos
Article by Alexandra Johnston
 Click Here to
Email This Article To a Friend
|
