HSfB Home
About Us
Downloads
Revision
News
Legislation News
Site News
Community Forums
Newsletter
Products and Services
Toolbox Talks
Training Links
Career Links
Useful Links
Your Articles
Bullying Survey
Feedback
Contents
Contact Us

7 October 2005 - 13.5 Million Pound Fines for Hatfield Rail Disaster

Navigation

Judge Justice Mackay passed his sentence at the Old Bailey today for the Hatfield Rail Disaster in which 4 people died and 102 were injured, when the King's Cross to Leeds train was derailed on 17 October 2000.

Judge Mackay ordered that Balfour Beatty be fined 10 million pounds and the rail operator, Network Rail, 3.5 million pounds, with both being ordered to pay £300,000 pounds each in costs.

Mr. Mackay, acknowledging the families of the victims who were in the courtroom, said:

"No fine or penalty can ever bring back those who have been lost. 

"Balfour Beatty's failure to maintain the track was the worst example of industrial negligence I have seen and Network Rail's failings were lamentable."

Mr. Mackay also said that in his 30 years in the legal profession, he regarded the company's failure as:

"The worst example of sustained industrial negligence in a high-risk industry he had ever seen".

In a statement from Mr. Bob Crow, General Secretary of RMT, Britain's largest railway union, he said:

"Compared with the carnage caused, these fines are a paltry amount -- and this is recycled public money anyway."

Balfour Beatty also commented in a statement and said:

"Hatfield was a tragedy and our thoughts remain with the bereaved families and with those injured and otherwise affected by it."

"It had apologised for problems with its track patrolling and inspection activities.

"It is, however, clear that the accident arose as a result of a systemic failure of the industry as a whole."

Chairman of Network Rail Ian McAllister said:

"The Hatfield accident was a tragedy for all concerned. And no amount of fine can offset the hurt and distress caused to the relatives of those who died and also to the injured.

"But I also think you have to remember that the railways since then have changed fundamentally."

"Maintenance had been brought in house and new technology introduced which had changed the mentality of the industry away from find and fix to one of predict and prevent.

"And the reason we have done that is in order to reduce the risk of an incident like Hatfield ever happening again.  And we believe we have minimised that risk."

Safe Trains Action Group Vice Chairman Carol Bell said:

"We have said that there have to be bigger, swingeing fines for companies and it's good to see that there have been in this case.

"The size of these fines sends a message to companies that they must take full regard of safety."


The final comment on this tragedy must come from Mr. Garry Fellows, who was severely injured in the crash, who said:

"I hope the money will be spent on improving the railways. I think that would only be some form of justice."

We at HSfB, our Members and Guests would like to send our heartfelt sympathies to all the families involved in this terrible disaster and hope that lessons of inadequate safety procedures have been truly heeded.

Our previous news reports on the Hatfield Rail Disaster can be accessed by clicking the following:

4 October 2005 - Update on Hatfield Rail Disaster

The first and second interim reports on the Hatfield Disaster can be accessed from the HSE Webpage by clicking the following:

Hatfield Train Derailment

Article by Alexandra Johnston

 

Click Here to Email This Article To a Friend

Health and Safety for Beginners - HSfB Home Page

Link to us

RSS Feed

 

Copyright © Health and Safety For Beginners

Terms And Conditions

Privacy Policy